Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
This Act saw the first major co-ordinated attempt by the Government of New
South Wales to regulate zoning and planning in the whole of New South Wales. The
Act repealed most of the planning control segments of the Local Government Act
and abolished the New South Wales Planning and Environment Commission, replacing
it with a Government department, initially named the Department of Environment
and Planning.
The implementation of the new Act also signalled an intention to extend the
scope of coverage of planning regulation to include an emphasis on the
environmental impact of proposed development.
Administratively and procedurally, the new legislation also operated to
replace the former modes of planning law and regulation, such as the local
planning scheme ordinances which had been contemplated by the County of
Cumberland Planning Scheme, with new forms of planning instruments, namely:
State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs), Regional Environmental Plans (REPs)
and Local Environmental Plans (LEPs).
Section 149 Planning Certificates
Land use in New South Wales is governed by a number of regulatory bodies and
environmental planning instruments. The starting point to ascertain the uses to
which a property may be put is by obtaining a Certificate under Section 149 of
the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act). This Certificate
may be obtained from the local Council which governs the area in which the land
is located. It is important to obtain a full certificate including the
information that the Council is required to include both under Section 149(2)
and Section 149(5) of the Act.
Local Environmental Plans
A Local Environmental Plan is an instrument prepared by a Council and
approved by the Minister in respect of the whole or any part of the land within
the Council's area. The provisions of the Local Environmental Plan relating to a
given parcel of land provide a detailed outline of the uses to which the land
may be put, generally with the consent of the relevant determining authority.
Local Environmental Plans may be obtained from Councils upon payment of a modest
fee.
State Environmental Planning Policies
State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) are instruments created by the
State Government to cover matters which in the opinion of the Minister for Urban
Affairs and Planning are of significance for the Environmental Planning of the
State. SEPPs generally serve to alter Local Environmental Planning instruments
by either providing more restrictions, relaxing existing provisions or doing
both of these things.
State Environmental Planning Policies are available from the New South Wales
Government Information Service or may be accessed on the Internet at
www.austlii.edu.au
Regional Environmental Plans
Like State Environmental Planning Policies, Regional Environmental Plans (REPs)
are prepared at State Government level. REPs may apply to all or part of a
region. The Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning may declare any land to
constitute a region.
Development Control Plans
Development Control Plans are policy instruments which do not carry direct
statutory force. Development Control Plans are intended to “flesh out” the
provisions of Local Environmental Plans and, also, Regional Environmental Plans.
They may be obtained from Councils on payment of a modest fee.
Other Sources of Planning Regulation
In addition to the above types of planning instruments there are a number of
other types or modes of planning regulation which may also need to be taken into
consideration in a given situation. These include:
“Deemed Environmental Planning Instruments”:
Many local planning schemes and interim development orders made prior to the
introduction of the EPA Act still remain in force, not having specifically been
repealed under the new Act or any Environmental Planning Instrument (EPI) made
under the new Act.
Ministerial Directions and Determinations:
Under Section 117 of the EPA Act, the Minister may direct a Council to
exercise its functions in the preparation and review of local environmental
plans. Section 71 of the EPA Act enables the Minister to make determinations of
the format, structure and subject-matter of a local environmental plan.
Model Provisions:
The EPA Act provides for a mechanism whereby model (or standard) provisions
may be directly incorporated by reference into an Environmental Planning
Instrument, either wholly or partially. Therefore, if model provisions are
adopted by a particular Environmental Planning Instrument, those model
provisions must also be referred to (in addition to the particular EPI).
Council Policies, Codes and Guidelines:
Apart from Development Control Plans (referred to above) Councils may adopt
various policies and/or formulate codes and/or guidelines to deal with various
issues which require the Council’s determination. These do not, however, have
legislative force and for this reason Councils may, in some circumstances, find
that they are unable to compel compliance with the requirements set out in such
documents. However, they still need to be taken into consideration, as a
practical matter, regardless of this.
Management Plans:
The Local Government Act 1993, as well as other legislation such as the
National Parks and Wildlife Service Act 1974, provide for the preparation and
implementation of management plans relating to specific areas under the
jurisdiction of the relevant legislation. These management plans may also have a
bearing on any development proposed in such areas.
Departmental Circulars:
These are issued from time to time by the Department of Urban Affairs and
Planning (and were also issued by its predecessors). Their purpose is primarily
to assist Councils and others in the implementation and interpretation of the
EPA Act and, although they are not legally binding, they are persuasive in the
interpretation of EPIs, particularly when there is any ambiguity involved in
that interpretation.
INTERPRETING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS
Zoning tables in Section 149 Planning Certificates
Section 149 Planning Certificates contain a statement as to the particular
zoning of the property to which the certificate relates. They also contain a
table detailing the uses land within that zone may be used for, without
development consent and uses permitted only with development consent. Uses which
are prohibited are also outlined.
How Environmental Planning Instruments Inter-relate
Section 149 Planning Certificates also contain details of all Environmental
Planning Instruments which apply to the land which is the subject of the
certificate. Generally Local Environmental Plans provide for the zoning of land.
A Local Environmental Plan will often contain or refer to a map showing the
zones of the area which is covered by the plan. It will then have a table
explaining what types of development are possible in each zone.
A Local Environmental Plan cannot be read in isolation. It is necessary to
refer to any State Environmental Planning Policies which are relevant and to a
lesser extent Regional Environmental Plans. What appears to be prohibited by a
particular Environmental Planning Instrument may be exempted from prohibition by
another Environmental Planning instrument.
In the event of an inconsistency between Environmental Planning Instruments,
Section 36 of the EPA Act provides that there is no general presumption that:
- A State Environmental Planning policy prevails over a Regional Environmental
Plan or a Local Environmental Plan; or
- A Regional Environmental Plan prevails over a Local Environmental Plan.
Section 36 however does provide that the provisions of a later instrument
prevail over the provisions of an earlier instrument, unless the contrary
intention appears.
Restrictions contained in Local Environmental Plans which may not apply
There are circumstances in which land uses prohibited by a Local
Environmental Plan may in fact be permissible under the terms of a State
Environmental Planning Policy or Regional Environmental Plan.
There are many State Environmental Planning Policies and Regional
Environmental Plans covering a wide range of topics. State Environmental
Planning Policies and Regional Environmental Plans may be accessed at the New
South Wales State Government Website.
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 (SEPP No.1) can assist to overcome
strict compliance with development standards contained in planning instruments.
This policy may be used by making an application (called an
"objection") containing submissions to the effect that the relevant
consent authority should dispense with the relevant development standard on the
basis that its application in the particular circumstances would be unreasonable
or unnecessary.
It is important to use the correct statutory wording when making a SEPP No. 1
objection. It should preferably be made simultaneously with a Development
Application in respect of a given parcel of land.
Limits on what is permitted by Local Environmental Plans
A Local Environmental Plan may seem to allow land use which is, in fact, not
permitted. In addition to overriding restrictions which may be imposed by State
planning instruments, Development Control Plans may, in practice, further define
and narrow permissible land uses in a given area.
In order to be legally valid, a Development Control Plan must generally
conform with the provisions of the Local Environmental Plan or Regional
Environmental Plan to which it relates. Development Control Plans are designed
to elaborate on what is contained in Local Environmental Plans and to further
define the purposes for which land may be used.
Consent Authorities (usually the local Council, but can also be some other
Statutory Authority or the Minister, in some cases) are not bound by the
provisions of Development Control Plans and accordingly it is not necessary to
make a SEPP No. 1 Objection if a Development Application does not comply with a
Development Control Plan.
It is important to be aware however that Councils generally tend to adhere to
the provisions of Development Control Plans that they have made.
Council Policies
Council Policies generally do not have any legal status as Environmental
Planning Instruments. It is important to have regard to them as they are
generally taken into account by Councils when determining development
applications. Council Policies are often referred to in Section 149 Planning
Certificates, however it is important to check whether there is a council policy
relating to a proposed Development Application prior to lodgement.
Changes of use for which consent is not required
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 4 details a number of changes of use
in respect of which no consent is required from Councils.
It is necessary, however, to inform the Council of such a change of use. The
Council will sometimes issue a “consent” to the change of use, however
Councils are not obliged to do this and consent is not legally required.
Exempt and Complying Development
There are also certain other types of development that do not require
development consent under an EPI: namely, "exempt development" and
"complying development".
An EPI can provide that specific types or classes of development which have a
minimal environmental impact are exempt development. Exempt development can be
undertaken without development consent, unless the subject land is critical
habitat or part of a wilderness area under the Wilderness Act 1987.
An EPI can also provide that certain local development which is capable of
being addressed by specified predetermined development standards is complying
development, and therefore does not require development consent. Particular
types of development, including State significant development, designated
development and development on land comprising or containing an item of
environmental heritage, among others, cannot be complying development.
EXISTING USE RIGHTS
Any summary of the Law of Zoning and Planning in New South Wales would be
incomplete without including a reference to existing use rights.
What are “Existing Use Rights”?
Existing use rights become an issue when an Environmental Planning Instrument
(EPI) which changes the status of a particular development and/or the zoning of
a particular area, comes into effect. The EPI may stipulate that the particular
current use is prohibited.
If the “existing use” is a use for a lawful planning purpose immediately
before the coming into force of an EPI which has the effect of prohibiting that
use, then that existing use is permitted to continue under the provisions of
Section 107 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EPA Act).
Why are Existing Use Rights Required?
The policy behind existing use rights attempts to balance the potential
significant economic hardship and dislocation that would or might result to land
owners or occupiers who are required to discontinue uses in order to conform
with a new EPI, with the need to continue on with the co-ordinated planning of
an area or region regardless of what might in effect be certain zoning
anomalies.
For example, a single factory may have been erected some forty years ago in a
then undeveloped area. The recent increasing demands of a growing urban
landscape now require the surrounding undeveloped land to be used for
residential purposes as, perhaps, a new suburb.
Provided the factory use was a lawful use immediately prior to the new EPI's
rezoning of the land as residential land, this industrial use would be an
existing use and would not be rendered unlawful by reason of the fact that the
new EPI prohibits industrial uses in that area.
Will Existing Use Rights Always Apply?
The short answer to this question is: No. Existing use rights represent a
significant concession by the regulatory authorities. The concession is,
however, constrained within reasonably narrow limits. Therefore, for example,
the existing use rights concession only applies if the relevant use was one that
was commenced with consent (if consent was required under the previous planning
law) or it was a lawful use which did not require consent under the previous
planning law.
This means that a use which did not conform with the requirements of the
previous planning law at the time the new EPI prohibiting the use came into
force, would not be protected by Section 107.
Even more significantly, from a practical perspective, is the fact that
existing use rights will generally be lost if the use is abandoned. A particular
use is presumed to be abandoned if it is not used for a continuous period of
twelve months (unless the contrary is established). The person relying on the
existing use has the onus of proving that the use existed and also that it has
not been abandoned.
What should I do if Existing Use Rights may apply?
Much of the case law relating to existing uses concerns the issue of whether
or not an existing use has been abandoned. This is a complex area and
professional legal advice should be sought if you seek to rely on existing use
rights.
FURTHER INFORMATION
This Information Outline is provided courtesy of Yandell Wright Stell who are
experienced in this area of law. They are located at Level 5, 139 Macquarie Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000 or call them on (02) 9252-2278 if you would like more information
on this legal topic, or you wish to obtain formal advice regarding your
situation.
Yandell Wright Stell Lawyers is a result oriented firm as distinct from a
procedurally-oriented firm. The result is achieving your goals as quickly and
efficiently as possible and to your best advantage. Our firm through its
professionals and support team supply legal services in the following areas of
law: *Property law including conveyancing, property development and planning
matters. *Commercial dispute resolution and litigation. *Immigration law
including all visa applications. *Banking and finance law. *Intellectual
property law including trade marks, copyright, designs and patents.
*Telecommunications and information technology law. *Insolvency and bankruptcy
law. *Corporate, commercial and business law matters. *Family law. We are
centrally located in Macquarie Street, Sydney from where we are able to deliver
first class results and personal service to all our clients.