Australia's leading provider of affordable DIY legal kits
Call our Customer Care Specialists on 1300 728 200
   

Legal Forum

Welcome to the FREE AussieLegal Forum

This FREE legal forum is supported by participating lawfirms in your local area.
The information contained in this public forum, and any comments made by the administrators, it's appointed mediators, or members of the public are of a general nature and may not be regarded as financial or legal advice in any way. We recommend that you seek formal advice from a practicing solicitor or licensed financial advisor regarding your particular situation. By registering to use this forum you meet the above criteria and agree to abide by all of the above rules and policies.

To be sure we provide you with the most relevant information to your state, please let us know which state you your legal matter resides in:

ACT  NSW  NT  QLD  SA  TAS  VIC  WA  

AussieLegal recommends this law firm:

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

A Company

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
weezaway View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01/October/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
  Quote weezaway Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: A Company
    Posted: 01/October/2012 at 16:44
We had to take NAME REMOVED to Consumer Affairs (BACV) because we were unhappy with the way they responded to us when we complained about cracks appearing in our house back in March. By 04June we had a Consumer Affairs Agreement as a result of mediation with NAME REMOVED, Consumer Affairs, myself and a Civil Engineer from the Building Commission. The agreement noted the Building Commission Engineer holding NAME REMOVED responsible for the slab heave and cracking damage to our house. They agreed to repair the house within 30 - 60 days.

They are in breach of this agreement. Some parts of the house have already been repaired twice (BADLY) and a report received yesterday from the same Civil Engineer states that they have still not complied with repairs required to mitigate further damage to the slab, and that the work they have done is not compliant with Australian Standards or the Building Code.

I have been fighting NAME REMOVED for 6 months to get them to properly repair our home without success. My husband has been diagnosed with a disability and lost his job because of his disability. We are now both pensioners and have to sell the house because we can no longer afford the mortgage. Our legal advice has been that if we do not disclose the condition of the building and surrounding ground as part of the sale contract / section 32, we risk legal action by a purchaser down the track. Disclosure puts us in the position of either taking a massive hit on the sale price if we can sell the house at all. Ethically both conveyancers and real estate agents have told us that it should be declared and we feel that this is the moral thing to do.

I would never build with NAME REMOVED and hope this warns anyone else thinking of building with them to reconsider and to build with someone else.



EDITED By a Mod to remove identifying details.





Edited by MartinO - 01/October/2012 at 23:13

AsiaOilDude View Drop Down
Legal Guru
Legal Guru


Joined: 17/February/2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2488
  Quote AsiaOilDude Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/October/2012 at 18:32
Why don't you save yourself a year of court and post them a cheque right now for defamation and slander? I suggest $100,000. IDIOT.
Not legal advice. Personal opinion only. Seek legal advice from qualified personnel only.

BD Eye View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/March/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 833
  Quote BD Eye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/October/2012 at 18:52
My exact thoughts AOD - isn't going to help the retirement fund much
BD Eye

NotGuilty View Drop Down
Legal Guru
Legal Guru


Joined: 19/February/2008
Location: ACT
Posts: 1136
  Quote NotGuilty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/October/2012 at 19:39
I doubt BH would succeed in a defamation action, however, to make everyone feel warm and fuzzy inside I suggest the final para should read "I would never build with BH again."

 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Want to save money?

Check out our list of do-it-yourself legal kits.

Need formal advice?

Let us help you find a lawyer who specializes in your particular area of law.

Need further information?

Visit our legal forum where you can ask questions and search for similar topics.